Occhipinti v. Buscemi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Occhipinti v. Buscemi

271 A.D.2d 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 881 (Occhipinti v. Buscemi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Occhipinti v. Buscemi, 271 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

The impleaded defendants appeal from an order restoring the case to the calendar for trial on the cross complaints of defendant Buscemi against defendant Williamsburg Packing Company, Inc., and defendant Adolf Gobel, Inc. Order affirmed, without costs. The motion may be deemed to have been for the opening of a default, as well as the restoration of the ease to the calendar for trial, and the order may be construed to have opened the default as well as to have restored the case to the calendar for trial. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The impleaded defendants appeal from an order restoring the case to the calendar for trial on the cross complaints of defendant Buscemi against defendant Williamsburg Packing Company, Inc., and defendant Adolf Gobel, Inc. Order affirmed, without costs. The motion may be deemed to have been for the opening of a default, as well as the restoration of the ease to the calendar for trial, and the order may be construed to have opened the default as well as to have restored the case to the calendar for trial. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/occhipinti-v-buscemi-nyappdiv-1946.