Occhione v. Babbitt

434 F. App'x 255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2125
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 434 F. App'x 255 (Occhione v. Babbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Occhione v. Babbitt, 434 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claudio Occhione petitions for review of the National Transportation Safety Board’s decision affirming the administrative law judge’s order upholding the suspension of Occhione’s pilot certificate. Our review of the record convinces us that the Board’s decision is based on substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Occhione v. Babbitt, Nos.2009AIR-00026, 2009-GL-05-0030, SE-18719 (NTSB Aug. 17, 2010). We grant Respondent’s motion to strike Occhione’s addendum. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Occhione v. Babbitt
181 L. Ed. 2d 366 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 F. App'x 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/occhione-v-babbitt-ca4-2011.