OCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

64 F. App'x 790
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 5, 2003
DocketNo. 02-1143
StatusPublished

This text of 64 F. App'x 790 (OCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
OCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 64 F. App'x 790 (D.D.C. 2003).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered upon the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and arguments of parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commission’s order be affirmed. Although the Commission’s order could have been more clear, its conclusion that when a license expires by operation of law under 47 U.S.C. § 312(g) the Commission lacks discretion to extend the license term necessarily defeats the appellant’s claim that the Commission should have reinstated its call letters for the limited purpose of considering an application for renewal of its license. The cases upon which the appellant relies, in which the Commission has considered renewal applications after expiration, do not involve § 312(g), and the Commission’s order adequately explains why it believes expiration by operation of § 312(g) is unique.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Administrative sanctions
47 U.S.C. § 312(g)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 F. App'x 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/occ-acquisitions-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-dcd-2003.