Ocasio v. MHR Management, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ocasio v. MHR Management, Inc.

94 A.D.3d 837, 941 N.Y.S.2d 847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.3d 837 (Ocasio v. MHR Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocasio v. MHR Management, Inc., 94 A.D.3d 837, 941 N.Y.S.2d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 11, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see CPLR 3212). Mastro, A.P.J, Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 11, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see CPLR 3212). Mastro, A.P.J, Hall, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.3d 837, 941 N.Y.S.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocasio-v-mhr-management-inc-nyappdiv-2012.