Ocasio v. City of New York Support Collection Unit

Second Circuit

Ocasio v. City of New York Support Collection Unit

167 F. App'x 269

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 2006

DocketNo. 05-4973-bk

StatusPublished

This text of 167 F. App'x 269 (Ocasio v. City of New York Support Collection Unit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ocasio v. City of New York Support Collection Unit, 167 F. App'x 269 (2d Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Juan Carlos Ocasio appeals the final order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.), affirming the dismissal of a complaint filed in an adversary proceeding commenced by Ocasio in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Black-shear, J.). We assume that the parties are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We AFFIRM the district court decision substantially for the reasons given therein. See Ocasio v. City of N.Y. Support Collection Unit (In re Ocasio), No. 04-cv-9586, 2005 WL 1529696, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12839 (S.D.N.Y.2005). The Appellant is to bear costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Juan Carlos Ocasio appeals the final order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.), affirming the dismissal of a complaint filed in an adversary proceeding commenced by Ocasio in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Black-shear, J.). We assume that the parties are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We AFFIRM the district court decision substantially for the reasons given therein. See Ocasio v. City of N.Y. Support Collection Unit (In re Ocasio), No. 04-cv-9586, 2005 WL 1529696, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12839 (S.D.N.Y.2005). The Appellant is to bear costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ocasio-v-city-of-new-york-support-collection-unit-ca2-2006.