O'Bryan v. O'Bryan

789 A.2d 995, 259 Conn. 911, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 29
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 3, 2002
DocketSC 16666
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 789 A.2d 995 (O'Bryan v. O'Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Bryan v. O'Bryan, 789 A.2d 995, 259 Conn. 911, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 29 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 51 (AC 20825), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not have authority, under General Statutes § 46b-66, to modify the postmajorify child support provision by requiring that a portion of it be paid directly to the child?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Bryan v. O'Bryan
813 A.2d 1001 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 A.2d 995, 259 Conn. 911, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obryan-v-obryan-conn-2002.