O'Brien v. Town of Weathersfield Zoning Board

415 A.2d 1060, 138 Vt. 357, 1980 Vt. LEXIS 1241
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedMay 16, 1980
DocketNo. 357-78
StatusPublished

This text of 415 A.2d 1060 (O'Brien v. Town of Weathersfield Zoning Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Brien v. Town of Weathersfield Zoning Board, 415 A.2d 1060, 138 Vt. 357, 1980 Vt. LEXIS 1241 (Vt. 1980).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal arose from a dismissal of an attempted appeal to Superior Court. The lower court determined that the procedure followed below did not comply with the provisions of V.E.C.P. 74 so as to give that court jurisdiction. Vermont Division of State Buildings v. Town of Castleton Board of Adjustment, 138 Vt. 250, 254, 415 A.2d 188, 191 (1980); State v. Kennison, 135 Vt. 238, 239, 373 A.2d 556, 557 (1977); Village of Northfield v. Chittenden Trust Co., 128 Vt. 240, 241, 260 A.2d 406, 407 (1969). That ruling is affirmed.

The court had granted a temporary restraining order for benefit of the plaintiffs. It was discharged with the dismissal of the action. The defendants Osgood, applicants to the Zoning Board for a construction permit, were the party restrained. They timely moved for a hearing for assessment of damages for the wrongful issuance of the temporary restraining order. Although the motion asserted a claim for recovery based on factual allegations of injury, it was denied without hearing. The Osgoods filed their own valid notice of appeal to this Court on that issue.

It is apparent that the order denying relief for injunctive injury was made without proper hearing. Therefore, that order must be reversed and the cause remanded for hearing on the limited question of whether or not the Osgoods can establish any damage under the law in connection with the improper imposition of the temporary restraining order. 12 V.S.A. § 4447, Town of Milton v. Brault, 132 Vt. 377, 320 A.2d 630 (1974).

The dismissal of the affeal of the order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment is affirmed; the order dismissing the motion for a hearing on the issue of damages consequent to the temporary restraining order is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the determination of such damages, if any.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Milton v. Brault
320 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)
Village of Northfield v. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY
260 A.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1969)
State v. Kennison
373 A.2d 556 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 A.2d 1060, 138 Vt. 357, 1980 Vt. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrien-v-town-of-weathersfield-zoning-board-vt-1980.