O'Brien v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'Brien v. State

151 So. 2d 452, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3541

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Brien v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3041 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1963·No. No. 62-547·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without oral argument, this court has thoroughly reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the respective parties to this cause and fail to find wherein the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of the law or has denied the appellant due process.

The authority of the court to revoke probation and to impose sentence is statutory. See § 948.06, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The record fails to disclose any departure from the requirements of the statute.

The judgment appealed should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Without oral argument, this court has thoroughly reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the respective parties to this cause and fail to find wherein the trial court has departed from the essential requirements of the law or has denied the appellant due process.

The authority of the court to revoke probation and to impose sentence is statutory. See § 948.06, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The record fails to disclose any departure from the requirements of the statute.

The judgment appealed should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

O'Brien v. State, 151 So. 2d 452, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3541 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

151 So. 2d 452 (O'Brien v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.