O'Brien v. Smith
66 U.S. 99, 17 L. Ed. 64, 1 Black 99, 1861 U.S. LEXIS 458
Opinion
We think the decision of the Circuit Court was right upon both of the points raised in the argument. The authorities referred to by the counsel for the defendant in error are conclusive, and it cantiot be necessary to discuss here question^- which we consider aá tóo well settled to be now open to serious controversy.
Judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Brien v. Smith, 66 U.S. 99, 17 L. Ed. 64, 1 Black 99, 1861 U.S. LEXIS 458 (1862).
66 U.S. 99 (O'Brien v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McKee, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
Merchants' Nat. Bank of Houston v. Dorchester
136 S.W. 551 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Salmon v. Rural Independent School Dist. of Allison
125 F. 235 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa, 1902)
Village of Kent v. Dana
100 F. 56 (Sixth Circuit, 1900)
Central Trust Co. of New York v. Indiana & L. M. R. Co.
98 F. 666 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)