O'Brien v. O'Brien
147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 250, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 570
Opinion
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rallón, and reported in 103 N. J. Eg. 214.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ.. 15.
For reversal — Done.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Brien v. O'Brien, 147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 250, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 570 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 911 (O'Brien v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eldredge v. Eldredge
119 A.2d 483 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Nashman v. Nashman
111 A.2d 318 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Zieper v. Zieper
96 A.2d 769 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Glasser v. Feller
58 A.2d 546 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Henderson v. Henderson
35 A.2d 686 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Locher v. Locher
163 A. 251 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
McKee v. McKee
151 A. 620 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)