O'Brien v. Gove

94 N.E. 271, 208 Mass. 325, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 821
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 3, 1911·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Rugg, J.

This is a suit in equity by which the plaintiff seeks to set aside the foreclosure of a mortgage on real estate, of which he owned the equity, on the ground that the foreclosure sale was not held as advertised. The case was referred to a master under an order in the usual form. lío exceptions were taken to the master’s report. The master found as a fact that the foreclosure sale was held as advertised and stated that this was the only issue tried before him. As the evidence is not reported, there is nothing upon which to base a criticism of this finding. It stands as final. A decree

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Brien v. Gove, 94 N.E. 271, 208 Mass. 325, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 821 (Mass. 1911).

94 N.E. 271 (O'Brien v. Gove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarthy v. Fitzgerald
5 N.E.2d 36 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Polep v. Manning
4 N.E.2d 447 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Moore v. Northampton Co-operative Bank
192 N.E. 747 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Milne v. Walsh
188 N.E. 624 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Levinson v. Connors
168 N.E. 736 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
244 Mass. 61 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)