O'Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc.

274 So. 2d 245, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7139

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 1973·No. No. 72-395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have very carefully read and studied the briefs and listened to the able oral arguments by the parties hereto and examined the record filed herein. Likewise, we have considered once again the opinion of this court rendered in O’Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 717, in which this court ruled upon certain facets dealing with the case sub judice.

It is our judgment, considering the totality of the circumstances disclosed by the record, that the trial court did not commit reversible error and, therefore, the findings and judgment of the trial court dated February 11, 1972, are hereby

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have very carefully read and studied the briefs and listened to the able oral arguments by the parties hereto and examined the record filed herein. Likewise, we have considered once again the opinion of this court rendered in O’Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 717, in which this court ruled upon certain facets dealing with the case sub judice.

It is our judgment, considering the totality of the circumstances disclosed by the record, that the trial court did not commit reversible error and, therefore, the findings and judgment of the trial court dated February 11, 1972, are hereby

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

O'Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc., 274 So. 2d 245, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7139 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

274 So. 2d 245 (O'Brien v. Gale J. Apple, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related