O'Brien v. Fitzgerald
29 N.Y.S. 975, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the opinion handed down in the case of O’Brien v. Kursheedt (decided herewith) 29 N. Y. Supp. 973, the interlocutory judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with leave to the defendant to answer upon payment of the costs of the appeal and in the «curt below. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Brien v. Fitzgerald, 29 N.Y.S. 975, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
29 N.Y.S. 975 (O'Brien v. Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mason v. Henry
31 N.Y.S. 1068 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)