O'Brien v. Fitzgerald
29 N.Y.S. 975, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616
This text of 29 N.Y.S. 975 (O'Brien v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Brien v. Fitzgerald, 29 N.Y.S. 975, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the opinion handed down in the case of O’Brien v. Kursheedt (decided herewith) 29 N. Y. Supp. 973, the interlocutory judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with leave to the defendant to answer upon payment of the costs of the appeal and in the «curt below. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mason v. Henry
31 N.Y.S. 1068 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 N.Y.S. 975, 86 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrien-v-fitzgerald-nysupct-1894.