O'Brien v. Empire Discount Corp.

25 A.D.2d 484, 267 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Brien v. Empire Discount Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 A.D.2d 677

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Williams, P. J., and Goldman, J., who dissent and vote for reversal in the following Memorandum: Equity [485]*485and fairness require that the amount received from the condemnation of a portion of the property covered by the Empire Discount Corporation mortgage should have been applied in reduction of the first mortgage. (See Muldoon v. Mid-Bronx Holding Corp., 287 N. Y. 227; Cyllene Corp. v. Eisen, 272 N. Y. 526; Matter of City of New York [Neptune Ave.], 271 N. Y. 331; Matter of City of New York [Houghton Ave.], 266 N. Y. 26, 29.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term foreclosing the mortgage and ordering a sale.)

Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Brien v. Empire Discount Corp., 25 A.D.2d 484, 267 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

25 A.D.2d 484 (O'Brien v. Empire Discount Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the City of New York Relative to Widening Neptune Avenue
3 N.E.2d 445 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Muldoon v. Mid-Bronx Holding Corp.
39 N.E.2d 217 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Matter of City of New York (Houghton Ave.)
193 N.E. 539 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Cyllene Corporation v. Eisen
4 N.E.2d 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)