O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt

43 So. 654, 118 La. 996, 1907 La. LEXIS 837
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 18, 1907
DocketNo. 16,451
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 So. 654 (O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt, 43 So. 654, 118 La. 996, 1907 La. LEXIS 837 (La. 1907).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.

BREAUX, C. J.

In a motion to dismiss, appellee suggests that the order granting a suspensive appeal had elapsed, and that therefore the appeal, in so far as it purports to be a suspensive appeal, should be dismissed.

The 10 days had elapsed from the date the judgment was signed to the day the order of appeal-was granted. The bond of appeal was signed after the 10 days had elapsed within which a suspensive appeal should be signed.

The appellant has no right to a suspensive appeal. Whatever right he has, if at all, must be urged on a devolutive appeal.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is dismissed in so far as it purports to be a suspensive appeal. The devolutive appeal remains unaffected by this dismissal, and the appellant is left with whatever right he may have to that appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Cozart
438 So. 2d 674 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Abrams v. Rosenthal
92 So. 567 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 654, 118 La. 996, 1907 La. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrien-v-dhemecourt-la-1907.