O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt

43 So. 654, 118 La. 996, 1907 La. LEXIS 837
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 18, 1907·No. No. 16,451·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.

BREAUX, C. J.

In a motion to dismiss, appellee suggests that the order granting a suspensive appeal had elapsed, and that therefore the appeal, in so far as it purports to be a suspensive appeal, should be dismissed.

The 10 days had elapsed from the date the judgment was signed to the day the order of appeal-was granted. The bond of appeal was signed after the 10 days had elapsed within which a suspensive appeal should be signed.

The appellant has no right to a suspensive appeal. Whatever right he has, if at all, must be urged on a devolutive appeal.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is dismissed in so far as it purports to be a suspensive appeal. The devolutive appeal remains unaffected by this dismissal, and the appellant is left with whatever right he may have to that appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt, 43 So. 654, 118 La. 996, 1907 La. LEXIS 837 (La. 1907).

43 So. 654 (O'Brien v. D'Hemecourt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson v. Cozart
438 So. 2d 674 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Abrams v. Rosenthal
92 So. 567 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)