O'Brien v. City of Detroit

162 N.W.2d 106, 11 Mich. App. 648, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1353
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1968·No. Docket No. 3,674·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The City of Detroit, Department of Street Railways, appeals a jury verdict of $2,000 in favor of Gladys A. O’Brien. An automobile driven by Mrs. O’Brien collided with a bus operated by one of defendant’s drivers at an intersection regulated by neither sign nor traffic signal. The defendant asserts the trial judge erred in submitting the issue of plaintiff’s contrihutory negligence to the jury and that he should have ruled the plaintiff con-tributorily negligent as a matter of law.

We have examined the record and have concluded that the trial judge did not err in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury. Ingram v. Henry (1964), 373 Mich 453; Clark v. Naufel (1950), 328 Mich 249, 253.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Levin, P. J., and Holbrook and Beer, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Brien v. City of Detroit, 162 N.W.2d 106, 11 Mich. App. 648, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1353 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

162 N.W.2d 106 (O'Brien v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Naufel
43 N.W.2d 839 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1950)
Ingram v. Henry
129 N.W.2d 879 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1964)