O'Brien v. Benderson
This text of 101 A.D.2d 1021 (O'Brien v. Benderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Amended order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Although the court did not err in permitting defendants to amend their answer to assert the defense of res judicata, it is unnecessary to consider whether plaintiff’s first cause of action is barred by reason of the compromise and settlement of a prior Federal court action. Neither cause of action stated in the complaint was proven at trial and we affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Trial Term (Broughton, J.) (Appeal from amended order and judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Broughton, J. — conversion.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.2d 1021, 476 N.Y.S.2d 697, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrien-v-benderson-nyappdiv-1984.