O'briant, Dylan Wade

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 23, 2021
DocketWR-92,554-01
StatusPublished

This text of O'briant, Dylan Wade (O'briant, Dylan Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'briant, Dylan Wade, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,554-01

EX PARTE DYLAN WADE O’BRIANT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 15-07-11740-1-CR IN THE 454TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM MEDINA COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child by contact

and sentenced to consecutive terms of 18 and 8 years’ imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals

dismissed the appeal. O’Briant v. State, No. 04-20-00381-CR (Tex. App. — San Antonio, Sept. 30,

2020). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

On March 16, 2021,1 the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

1 The order is dated April 16, but we received the record containing this order on April 13. The district clerk’s file stamp on the order is March 16, 2021. 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court held an evidentiary

hearing and made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial

court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

We note that Judge Kindred, who is the habeas judge, was the District Attorney in this case.

The record does not reflect that Judge Kindred participated in the 2017 or 2020 proceedings, but it

appears that he signed the 2018 motions to adjudicate guilt. See Gamez v. State, 737 S.W.2d 315,

318 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 23, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gamez v. State
737 S.W.2d 315 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
O'briant, Dylan Wade, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obriant-dylan-wade-texcrimapp-2021.