O'Brian v. State
This text of 181 So. 532 (O'Brian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To a conviction of the offense of aggravated assault, plaintiffs in error sued out writ of error.
The only contention made as ground for reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.
*595 The evidence was conflicting but the jury within its province resolved the conflicts against the contentions of the accused.
The record discloses substantial evidence to support the judgment and, as the whole record discloses no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 So. 532, 132 Fla. 594, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrian-v-state-fla-1938.