O'BRIAN OAKLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of O'BRIAN OAKLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (O'BRIAN OAKLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
O'BRIAN OAKLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Nos. 4D20-879 and 4D21-792
[November 4, 2021]
Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 062012CF011456A88810.
O'Brian Oakley, Mayo, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CONNER, C.J., GROSS, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
O'BRIAN OAKLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obrian-oakley-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.