O'Boyle v. United States

49 F.2d 273, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3205
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in O'Boyle v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 F.2d 585
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 1, 1931·No. No. 139·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This motion is to recall the mandate and strike out the allowance of costs granted against the United States. Costs may not be awarded against the United States in this form of action. Shewan & Sons v. United States, 267 U. S. 86, 45 S. Ct. 238, 69 L. Ed. 527; Pine River Co. v. United States, 186 U. S. 279, 22 S. Ct. 920, 46 L. Ed. 1164; Treat v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 185 F. 760 (C. C. A. 2); Carlisle v. Cooper, 64 F. 472 (C. C. A. 2); Rule 28, subd. 4, U. S. C. C. A. 2d Circuit. The mandate will be recalled and the motion granted unless the appellant stipulate to relinquish the costs awarded.

Motion granted accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Boyle v. United States, 49 F.2d 273, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3205 (2d Cir. 1931).

49 F.2d 273 (O'Boyle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pine River Logging Co. v. United States
186 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1902)
James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United States
267 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Treat v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
185 F. 760 (Second Circuit, 1911)
Carlisle v. Cooper
64 F. 472 (Second Circuit, 1894)