Obot v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

New York Court of Appeals

Obot v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

726 N.E.2d 480, 94 N.Y.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 3, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 63

DecidedJanuary 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 726 N.E.2d 480 (Obot v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Obot v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, 726 N.E.2d 480, 94 N.Y.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 3, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 63 (N.Y. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken on behalf of Carol O. Obot, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that Otu A. Obot is not authorized to represent Carol O. Obot; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of Carol O. Obot, dismissed upon the ground that Otu A. Obot is not authorized to represent Carol O. Obot; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken on behalf of Carol O. Obot, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that Otu A. Obot is not authorized to represent Carol O. Obot; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of Carol O. Obot, dismissed upon the ground that Otu A. Obot is not authorized to represent Carol O. Obot; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

726 N.E.2d 480, 94 N.Y.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 3, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obot-v-new-york-state-tax-appeals-tribunal-ny-2000.