Oblinger v. Sigman

Eighth Circuit

Oblinger v. Sigman

637 F. App'x 966

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2016·No. No. 15-3261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate David Oblinger appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting numerous claims of constitutional violations. Upon de novo review of Oblinger’s complaint and attached exhibits, we conclude that he did not state any claim for relief. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also grant Oblinger’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and deny his motions for appointment of appellate counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate David Oblinger appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting numerous claims of constitutional violations. Upon de novo review of Oblinger’s complaint and attached exhibits, we conclude that he did not state any claim for relief. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also grant Oblinger’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and deny his motions for appointment of appellate counsel.

Oblinger v. Sigman, 637 F. App'x 966 (8th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

637 F. App'x 966 (Oblinger v. Sigman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related