O'Bierne v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Bierne v. Seeley

214 A.D. 792

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D. 792 (O'Bierne v. Seeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Bierne v. Seeley, 214 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed [793]*793on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant has more necessary and material witnesses residing in the county where the accident occurred than the plaintiff has in the county where the action is commenced. Under the circumstances, the place of the transaction or occurrence should control the place of trial. (Cole v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., 179 App. Div. 442.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed [793]*793on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant has more necessary and material witnesses residing in the county where the accident occurred than the plaintiff has in the county where the action is commenced. Under the circumstances, the place of the transaction or occurrence should control the place of trial. (Cole v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., 179 App. Div. 442.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obierne-v-seeley-nyappdiv-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack