O'Bierne v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Bierne v. Seeley

214 A.D. 792

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1925·Published

Opinion

Order reversed [793]*793on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant has more necessary and material witnesses residing in the county where the accident occurred than the plaintiff has in the county where the action is commenced. Under the circumstances, the place of the transaction or occurrence should control the place of trial. (Cole v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., 179 App. Div. 442.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed [793]*793on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant has more necessary and material witnesses residing in the county where the accident occurred than the plaintiff has in the county where the action is commenced. Under the circumstances, the place of the transaction or occurrence should control the place of trial. (Cole v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp., 179 App. Div. 442.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

O'Bierne v. Seeley, 214 A.D. 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

214 A.D. 792 (O'Bierne v. Seeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related