Oberstein v. Lantinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oberstein v. Lantinberg

174 A.D. 880, 159 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 880 (Oberstein v. Lantinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oberstein v. Lantinberg, 174 A.D. 880, 159 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal from order of May 1, 1916, granted, with ten dollars costs. This motion is granted without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to appeal from the order of April 14,1916, if no written notice of entry thereof has been served upon his attorney. There is no proof of the fact of service of that notice in the moving affidavits. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal from order of May 1, 1916, granted, with ten dollars costs. This motion is granted without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to appeal from the order of April 14,1916, if no written notice of entry thereof has been served upon his attorney. There is no proof of the fact of service of that notice in the moving affidavits. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 880, 159 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oberstein-v-lantinberg-nyappdiv-1916.