Oberstein v. Diack

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Oberstein v. Diack

32 Misc. 709, 65 N.Y.S. 1142

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 709 (Oberstein v. Diack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oberstein v. Diack, 32 Misc. 709, 65 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From the judgment, it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant.

The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife’s interest in the policy.

From the evidence, it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant.

Present: Truax, P. J., Soott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI