O'Berry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

O'Berry v. State

406 So. 2d 1251, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21899

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1981·No. No. 81-271·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SHARP, Judge.

In appealing his judgment and sentence for sexual battery, appellant asserts two procedural trial errors and also contends he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender pursuant to Chapter 958, Florida Statutes (1979). We find no merit to appellant’s first two objections and further determine he failed to present his sentencing argument to the trial court. Accordingly the judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to [1252] seek appropriate relief, e.g., through Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Rubasky v. State, 401 So.2d 894 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Dunman v. State, 400 So.2d 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHARP, Judge.

In appealing his judgment and sentence for sexual battery, appellant asserts two procedural trial errors and also contends he should have been sentenced as a youthful offender pursuant to Chapter 958, Florida Statutes (1979). We find no merit to appellant’s first two objections and further determine he failed to present his sentencing argument to the trial court. Accordingly the judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to [1252] seek appropriate relief, e.g., through Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Rubasky v. State, 401 So.2d 894 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Dunman v. State, 400 So.2d 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

O'Berry v. State, 406 So. 2d 1251, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

406 So. 2d 1251 (O'Berry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related