Oberly v. Oberly

42 A. 1105, 190 Pa. 341, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1027
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 13, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 67·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied, from our examination of the evidence in this case, that it is wholly insufficient to sustain the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant lot into a defense. The learned court was therefore clearly right in discharging the rule.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oberly v. Oberly, 42 A. 1105, 190 Pa. 341, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1027 (Pa. 1899).

42 A. 1105 (Oberly v. Oberly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kolf v. Lieberman
128 A. 122 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Graham
105 A. 295 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Haynes v. Harriman
92 N.W. 1100 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)
Good Hope Building Ass'n v. Amweg
22 Pa. Super. 143 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)
McIntosh v. Condron
20 Pa. Super. 118 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Guernsey v. Froude
13 Pa. Super. 405 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)