Oberly v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Oberly v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.

104 A. 864, 262 Pa. 83, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 593

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 17, 1918

DocketAppeal, No. 90

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 104 A. 864 (Oberly v. H. C. Frick Coke Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oberly v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 104 A. 864, 262 Pa. 83, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 593 (Pa. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The refusal to grant or continue a preliminary injunction is error only when the right threatened with invasion is an unquestionable one, and the only protection from irreparable injury to it is to be found in a court of equity: Crawford v. Sullivan, 238 Pa. 142. In view of this rule the court below did not err in refusing to continue the injunction, and its decree dissolving the same is affirmed, at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The refusal to grant or continue a preliminary injunction is error only when the right threatened with invasion is an unquestionable one, and the only protection from irreparable injury to it is to be found in a court of equity: Crawford v. Sullivan, 238 Pa. 142. In view of this rule the court below did not err in refusing to continue the injunction, and its decree dissolving the same is affirmed, at appellants’ costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A. 864, 262 Pa. 83, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oberly-v-h-c-frick-coke-co-pa-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack