Oberlies v. Oliva
45 Misc. 2d 533, 257 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1173
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 17, 1964·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Landlord has not proven a proper demand for the rent ¡as provided by statute (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 711, subd. 2) and failure to comply with the statute bars the proceeding to obtain possession of leased premises (Fleisher v. Wolff, 91 N. Y. S. 2d 427).
The judgment should be affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a new proceeding.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Capozzoli and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oberlies v. Oliva, 45 Misc. 2d 533, 257 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
45 Misc. 2d 533 (Oberlies v. Oliva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacob Marion, LLC v. Jones
2019 NY Slip Op 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Zenila Realty Corp. v. Masterandrea
123 Misc. 2d 1 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1984)
Schwartz v. Weiss-Newell
87 Misc. 2d 558 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Fitzgerald v. Washington
80 Misc. 2d 861 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)