Oberlies v. Oliva
This text of 45 Misc. 2d 533 (Oberlies v. Oliva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Landlord has not proven a proper demand for the rent ¡as provided by statute (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 711, subd. 2) and failure to comply with the statute bars the proceeding to obtain possession of leased premises (Fleisher v. Wolff, 91 N. Y. S. 2d 427).
The judgment should be affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a new proceeding.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Capozzoli and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Misc. 2d 533, 257 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oberlies-v-oliva-nyappterm-1964.