Oberholzer, F. v. Galapo, S., Pets.
This text of Oberholzer, F. v. Galapo, S., Pets. (Oberholzer, F. v. Galapo, S., Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
FREDERICK E. OBERHOLZER, JR. AND : No. 154 MAL 2022 DENISE L. OBERHOLZER, : : Respondents : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : SIMON AND TOBY GALAPO, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
(1) Whether an injunction prohibiting ongoing publication constitutes an impermissible prior restraint under Article I, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution?
(2) Whether the publication of language which gives rise to tort claims other than defamation cannot be enjoined under Article I, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution?
(3) Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law by concluding that the injunction was content-neutral and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oberholzer, F. v. Galapo, S., Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oberholzer-f-v-galapo-s-pets-pa-2022.