Oberholz v. Odom
43 S.W.2d 122
This text of 43 S.W.2d 122 (Oberholz v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oberholz v. Odom, 43 S.W.2d 122 (Tex. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above).
The evidence as quoted above fully sustains the jury’s verdict that appellees were in the individual employment of Mr. Oberholz. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, in all things affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 S.W.2d 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oberholz-v-odom-texapp-1931.