Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke

688 F. App'x 211

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2017·No. No. 16-7413·Published

Opinion

[212] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Uhuru’ Sekou Obataiye-AIlah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00230-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[212] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Uhuru’ Sekou Obataiye-AIlah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00230-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke, 688 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

688 F. App'x 211 (Obataiye-Allah v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related