Obarts v. State

320 S.W.2d 816, 167 Tex. Crim. 385, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1849
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 1959
Docket30414
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 320 S.W.2d 816 (Obarts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Obarts v. State, 320 S.W.2d 816, 167 Tex. Crim. 385, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1849 (Tex. 1959).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is operating- a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $100.

The verdict was returned on May 23, 1958, and judgment was entered.

Motion for new trial was filed on the same day. Amended motion for new trial was filed on June 12, 1958.

*386 The amended motion for new trial was overruled by operation of law at the expiration of the twenty days allowed by Art. 755 V.A.C.C.P., and the judgment became final. See Mahan v. State, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 36, 288 S.W. 2d 508; DeHay v. State, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 516, 294 S. W.2d 401; Atkinson v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 421, 299 S.W. 2d 951; Barton v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 582, 310 S.W. 2d 90; Pruitt v. State, 165 Texas Cr. Rep. 641, 310 S.W. 2d 338; Brinkley v. State, No. 29926 (page----, this volume), 320 S.W. 2d 855; Torrez v. State, No. 29947, (page 25, this volume), 316 S.W. 2d 417; Brantley v. State, No. 30263 (page 145, this volume), 320 S.W. 2d 825.

No notice of appeal was given at the term of court during which the judgment was rendered and become final, as required by Art. 827 V.A.C.C.P.

On July 7, 1958, the court entered an order overruling appellant’s motion for new trial and pronounced sentence reciting that appellant gave notice of appeal.

In view of the majority holding in Feagin v. State, 166 Texas Cr. Rep. 3, 310 S.W. 2d 99, holding void the amendment of Art. 768 V.A.C.C.P. providing for sentence in misdemeanor cases as well as felonies, the sentence is a nullity and the notice of appeal therein comes too late.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Texas v. Moore, Billy
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007
State v. Moore
225 S.W.3d 556 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Newhall v. State
404 S.W.2d 592 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Grimes v. State
349 S.W.2d 598 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 S.W.2d 816, 167 Tex. Crim. 385, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obarts-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.