O'Barr v. Cobble

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Barr v. Cobble

449 S.W.3d 398, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2014 WL 4565979

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2014·No. No. ED 100608·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason O’Barr appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of David Cobble, Jr. (“Cobble”). O’Barr argues the trial court erred in granting Cobble’s motion for directed verdict.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason O’Barr appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of David Cobble, Jr. (“Cobble”). O’Barr argues the trial court erred in granting Cobble’s motion for directed verdict.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

O'Barr v. Cobble, 449 S.W.3d 398, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 2014 WL 4565979 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

449 S.W.3d 398 (O'Barr v. Cobble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.