O'Bannon & Co. v. Relf & Bledsoe
This text of 37 Ky. 320 (O'Bannon & Co. v. Relf & Bledsoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
announced the decision of this Court, as follows:—
As the declaration shows that the bagging was ac-oepted by the plaintiffs, and does not show, either that they had no opportunity of inspecting it at the time of delivery, or that they did not then know, or might not, from the nature of the goods and of the transaction, have known of the defects now alleged, by reasonable ¿Lili-gence; and as it does not show when the defects were discovered, nor that, when discovered, the defendants were notified, or the return of the goods tendered, nor any reason why this was not done — we are of opinion that, upon the whole declaration, the presumption is, that the acceptance was a discharge of the defendants’ covenant; and, therefore, that no cause of action is shown.
Wherefore, the judgment for the defendants, on their demurrer to the declaration, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Ky. 320, 7 Dana 320, 1838 Ky. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/obannon-co-v-relf-bledsoe-kyctapp-1838.