Obama-Carter v. United States Government

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: April 25, 2011
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2011-0783
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED Audrey Obama-Carter, ) APR 2 5 2011 ) Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy Plaintiff, ) Courts for the DIstrict of ColumbIa ) v. ) Civil Action No.

United States, et aI., ) ) 11 0783 ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is

required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

The plaintiff sues a host of political figures and celebrities. See Complaint ("CompI.")

Caption. Her accusations of rape, blackmail and extortion allegedly after she married President

Barack Obama, see Compi. at I, and allegations that, inter alia, Oprah Winfrey willed her "3/4 of

her estate but commited [sic] crimes on me and the State of New Jersey ... made her give me her

entire estate .... , id. at 2, and Donald Trump "did not allow [her], Audrey Carter and President

Obama to live together .... ," id., are the type of fantastic or delusional scenarios warranting

dismissal under § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord

Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). )

Date: April W ,2011

I ) A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. /~