Obah v. Medrite Urgent Care
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATRICK OBAH, Plaintiff, 1:24-CV-7204 (RA) -against- ORDER MEDRITE URGENT CARE, Defendant. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 25, 2025 / New York, New York ki / —, Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Obah v. Medrite Urgent Care (Obah v. Medrite Urgent Care) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.