Oatman v. Oatman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oatman v. Oatman

267 A.D. 805, 46 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1943·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed. Memorandum: The separation agreement, pleaded as a defense, bars the maintenance of this action. (Winter v. Winter, 191 N. Y. 462, 473-475; Matter of Rhinelander, 290 N. Y. 31, 37; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 App. Div. 221; Drane v. Drane, 207 App. Div. 217; Almonte v. Almonte, 259 App. Div. 311; Matter of Tierney, 148 Misc. 378, 383.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for separation.) Present'— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed. Memorandum: The separation agreement, pleaded as a defense, bars the maintenance of this action. (Winter v. Winter, 191 N. Y. 462, 473-475; Matter of Rhinelander, 290 N. Y. 31, 37; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 App. Div. 221; Drane v. Drane, 207 App. Div. 217; Almonte v. Almonte, 259 App. Div. 311; Matter of Tierney, 148 Misc. 378, 383.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for separation.) Present'— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Oatman v. Oatman, 267 A.D. 805, 46 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

267 A.D. 805 (Oatman v. Oatman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related