Oatman v. Oatman

267 A.D. 805, 46 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 267 A.D. 805 (Oatman v. Oatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oatman v. Oatman, 267 A.D. 805, 46 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed. Memorandum: The separation agreement, pleaded as a defense, bars the maintenance of this action. (Winter v. Winter, 191 N. Y. 462, 473-475; Matter of Rhinelander, 290 N. Y. 31, 37; Benesch v. Benesch, 182 App. Div. 221; Drane v. Drane, 207 App. Div. 217; Almonte v. Almonte, 259 App. Div. 311; Matter of Tierney, 148 Misc. 378, 383.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for separation.) Present'— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durso v. Durso
205 Misc. 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
Haas v. Haas
80 N.E.2d 337 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Adamik v. Adamik
190 Misc. 851 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
McAvoy v. McAvoy
272 A.D.2d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D. 805, 46 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oatman-v-oatman-nyappdiv-1943.