Oates v. State
410 So. 2d 960, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1982
DocketNo. AG-237
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 410 So. 2d 960 (Oates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oates v. State, 410 So. 2d 960, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
Opinion
We reverse and remand this cause solely for resentencing because the trial court imposed an illegal split sentence. See Segal v. Wainwright, 304 So.2d 446 (Fla.1974); Rozmestor v. State, 381 So.2d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The judgment is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Drew v. State
478 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Wray v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.
410 So. 2d 960 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
410 So. 2d 960, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oates-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.