Oates v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Oates v. New York City Transit Authority

65 N.E.3d 1280, 28 N.Y.3d 1046

DecidedNovember 17, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.E.3d 1280 (Oates v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oates v. New York City Transit Authority, 65 N.E.3d 1280, 28 N.Y.3d 1046 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly determined that legally sufficient evidence supported the jury’s findings of negligence and entitlement to damages for decedent’s conscious pain and suffering.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly determined that legally sufficient evidence supported the jury’s findings of negligence and entitlement to damages for decedent’s conscious pain and suffering.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.E.3d 1280, 28 N.Y.3d 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oates-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-2016.