Oakman v. Rogers
120 Mass. 214, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 155
Opinion
The letters relied on do not show that the parties ever agreed on the number of jars, the time or manner of delivery, or the other terms of the alleged contract of sale, and are not a sufficient memorandum to take the case out of the statute of frauds. Judgment for the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oakman v. Rogers, 120 Mass. 214, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 155 (Mass. 1876).
120 Mass. 214 (Oakman v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peoples Outfitting Co. v. Wheeling Mattress Co.
118 N.E. 827 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1918)
Leatherbee v. Bernier
65 N.E. 842 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Fishel v. Turner
13 Haw. 392 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1901)
Rucker v. Harrington
52 Mo. App. 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Banks v. Chas. P. Harris Manuf'g Co.
20 F. 667 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Ashcroft v. Butterworth
136 Mass. 511 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)