Oakley v. Stouffer

Fourth Circuit

Oakley v. Stouffer

455 F. App'x 318

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2011·No. No. 11-6894·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Oakley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oakley v. Stouffer, No. 8:10-cv-02118-AW, 2011 [319]*319WL 2604690 (D. Md. June 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Oakley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oakley v. Stouffer, No. 8:10-cv-02118-AW, 2011 [319]*319WL 2604690 (D. Md. June 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Oakley v. Stouffer, 455 F. App'x 318 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

455 F. App'x 318 (Oakley v. Stouffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related