Oakley v. Steddiford
3 Johns. 253
This text of 3 Johns. 253 (Oakley v. Steddiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oakley v. Steddiford, 3 Johns. 253 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
Opinion
On the offer of the plaintiff, to have a verdict entered for the defendant Marschalk, we see no reason for setting aside the inquest, as he, by the offer, will have the full benefit of his discharge. On condition, therefore, that the plaintiff performs his stipulation in ten days, we refuse the rule.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-v-steddiford-nysupct-1808.