Oakley v. State
289 S.W. 72
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oakley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Tex. Crim. 371 →
Opinions
The original opinion filed herein is withdrawn, and in lieu .thereof the following is substituted;
[73]*73Appellant was charged, tried, and convicted in the corporation court of the city of Port Arthur of the offense of vagrancy, and against him was assessed a fine of $25. Upon the authority of the opinion in the case of Loraine King v. State (No. 10208) 289 S. W. 69, this day decided, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the prosecution is" ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oakley v. State, 289 S.W. 72 (Tex. 1926).
289 S.W. 72 (Oakley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
289 S.W. 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)