Oakley v. State

298 N.E.2d 120, 32 N.Y.2d 773, 344 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1311
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 1973
DocketClaim 50194
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 N.E.2d 120 (Oakley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oakley v. State, 298 N.E.2d 120, 32 N.Y.2d 773, 344 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1311 (N.Y. 1973).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bbeitel, Jasen and Jones. Judges Bueke, G-abbielli and Wachtleb dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. State
63 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 N.E.2d 120, 32 N.Y.2d 773, 344 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-v-state-ny-1973.