Oakley v. Pierce
43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637
This text of 43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 (Oakley v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oakley v. Pierce, 43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).
Opinion
Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and the order of the county judge vacated. Held, that the affidavit on which the order was made did not show that the plaintiff was a non-resident of the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-v-pierce-nysupct-1885.