Oakley v. O'Neill

2 N.J. Eq. 287
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedJanuary 15, 1840
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 287 (Oakley v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oakley v. O'Neill, 2 N.J. Eq. 287 (N.J. Ct. App. 1840).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The rule contended for by (he defendants’ counsel does not prevail in equity. The complainant is entitled to his decree, at any time after tlie rule to appear, &c. has expired, and it. will be granted as of course unless it appear that some prejudice will accrue to the adverse party.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.J. Eq. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-v-oneill-njch-1840.