Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
665 A.2d 609, 235 Conn. 917, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 375
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 506 (AC 12900), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the Superior Court had jurisdiction to consider the plaintiffs motion for fees and expenses under General Statutes § 4-184a?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 665 A.2d 609, 235 Conn. 917, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 375 (Colo. 1995).
665 A.2d 609 (Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
675 A.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)