Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

665 A.2d 609, 235 Conn. 917, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 375
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 28, 1995·No. SC 15316·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 506 (AC 12900), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the Superior Court had jurisdiction to consider the plaintiffs motion for fees and expenses under General Statutes § 4-184a?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 665 A.2d 609, 235 Conn. 917, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 375 (Colo. 1995).

665 A.2d 609 (Oakley v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
675 A.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)