Oakley v. Ball
356 So. 2d 6, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17312
Opinions
Our review of the briefs and appendix leads us to the conclusion that appellants have failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, the order appealed from is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oakley v. Ball, 356 So. 2d 6, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
356 So. 2d 6 (Oakley v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Certificate of New York to Compel Attendance of Witness
297 So. 2d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)